Return to Blog Archives>>

TEPC Represented 3 out of 7 Defendants From Wired Magazine’s List of the Most Controversial CFAA Cases of All Time

Wired Magazine recently published an article describing what it considers to be the most controversial Computer Fraud Abuse Act (“CFAA”) criminal prosecutions of all time. Of the seven cases Wired listed, Tor Ekeland P.C. represented the defendants in three of them. The cases are United States v. Auernheimer, 11-CR- 470  (D.N.J.), United States v. Salinas, 13-CR-1439 (S.D. Tx.), and United States v. Matthew Keys, 13-CR-82 (E.D. Ca.). ]]]]> ]]>

Road to Nowhere

In Liminae: The Road to Nowhere

It takes us about six hours to drive to the rural state jail (that’s owned by two judges) the Feds contracted with to hold our client. Accused of computer crimes, he can’t effectively review evidence in jail – there’s no practical access to computers in the gulag. They’ve seized all his assets claiming they’re the ill-gotten gains of crimes the government can’t identify, and their computer forensics – if you can call them that – have no scientific basis and are full of basic errors and typos. In my decade as a federal criminal defense lawyer doing computer cases across the country, I’ve never come across a case where the government was so completely off.

Read More »

Guilty Until Proven Innocent

A defendant’s view from the trenches of federal criminal court This post is originally published to Substack. You can read and follow us there. https://torekeland.substack.com/p/guilty-until-proven-innocent

Read More »

For media inquiries, please email info@torekeland.com

30 WALL STREET, 8TH FLOOR • NEW YORK, NY 10005

©2022 Tor Ekeland Law, PLLC   •  info@torekeland.com

Attorney Advertising   •   Past results do not guarantee future results   •   Licensed in New York